<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://blog.x1discovery.com/2026/05/19/de-nisting-in-ediscovery-a-costly-provision-that-shouldnt-be-in-model-orders-in-the-first-place/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Next Gen eDiscovery Law &amp; Tech Blog</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-19T15:33:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>De-NISTing in eDiscovery: A Costly Provision That Shouldn’t Be in Model Orders in the First Place</news:title><news:keywords>eDiscovery, technology, e-discovery, X1, x1 enterprise, Case Law, AI In-Place</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>